12-07-2009, 03:46 AM | #1 |
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: orbital platform
Posts: 741
|
Watch this space!
http://www.nortoncanada.ca/splash_page.html
Product: http://www.nortonmotorcycles.com/bikes/ With some luck, Lucas, the prince of darkness, has been given a LONG holiday. |
|
12-07-2009, 12:32 PM | #2 |
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sardis, BC, Canada
Posts: 25,977
|
The 961SE is 16000 GBP, or $36350.00 Canadian or $30891.00 USD. 8O
Lucas or not, that's a lot of cash. Still, I'm interested to see the bikes close up at the motorcycle show in the new year, along with the Canadian price point.
__________________
Weldangrind "I figure I'm well-prepared for coping with a bike that comes from the factory with unresolved issues and that rewards the self-reliant owner." - Buccaneer |
|
12-07-2009, 03:43 PM | #3 |
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: orbital platform
Posts: 741
|
The sport is : £11,995, but that is "ALL IN", knock by at least 1/3 for export ( £9000) $15571 Canadian.
I fondly remember a 850JPS, but that 850, like a 961 vertical twin, will not be fast at building revs, it will go like a freight train, but unless you ride it at "the pin" it will be slow accelerating. (claim of 80bhp) They (being Norton) are talking about a limited release of the rotary for idiots like us. That would be "the one" to buy (I can only guess at the HP, 120?). |
|
12-07-2009, 04:25 PM | #4 | |
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sardis, BC, Canada
Posts: 25,977
|
Quote:
Rotary engines are hairy enough in old Mazdas. I can't imagine a rotary bike.
__________________
Weldangrind "I figure I'm well-prepared for coping with a bike that comes from the factory with unresolved issues and that rewards the self-reliant owner." - Buccaneer |
|
|
12-07-2009, 04:55 PM | #5 |
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Surrey, B.C., Canada
Posts: 2,185
|
That's a neat idea in a motorcycle though. Instant RPM response, lighter, less likely to seize during a overheat etc.
Probably less efficient fuel wise, but it'd be small enough in a motorcyle to be minimal. Probably much too much power for ME though, but interesting concept. |
|
12-07-2009, 05:20 PM | #6 |
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bend, Oregon
Posts: 348
|
Norton made a rotary engine bike back in the 70s. It wasn't very reliable or very fast and didn't catch on. Suzuki also made one.
Back in the early 70s I had a Norton Atlas. The thing was very fast for the time but the vibration would shake the fillings out of your teeth. Couldn't ride it for more than an hour at a time. Q |
|
12-07-2009, 05:58 PM | #7 | |
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: orbital platform
Posts: 741
|
Quote:
The atlas was a bone shaker (and a crankshaft breaker), the improvement, in the Commando, was a rubber mounted engine/transmission/swing arm, and, of course, more displacement. These big old twins, to be ridden fast, HAVE to be run "to the pin", combined with a close ratio transmission, it wasn't hard work, but you had to work at it. Properly set up, they handled like they were on a rail, NO surprises. I "ate" many a Honda (750), or 4 cycle Kawasaki (900), on the street with my Norton. BTW: Lucas is no more, they were bought by Bosch, probably employ many of the same people though! Ah yes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|