Go Back   ChinaRiders Forums > Technical/Performance > Dual Sport/Enduro
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Today, 07:54 AM   #1
Zapkin   Zapkin is offline
 
Zapkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2022
Location: Ohio Valley
Posts: 706
17/40 sprocket setup for hawk 250

Well, since it has become abundantly clear that I won't be taking the Hawk off road anymore, I am interested in getting the RPM's as low as possible for street riding. I've seen several people on Amazon switch to the 17/40 setup. I understand I will lose some oomph. But my question is, will my 128 tooth chain fit? I've seen on Amazon that the 17/40 and 128 tooth chains are often bought together, but I wanted to ask you guys before ordering. Thanks.
__________________
2022 Hawk 250


 
Reply With Quote
Old Today, 09:36 AM   #2
JerryHawk250   JerryHawk250 is online now
Moderator
 
JerryHawk250's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Houma, La.
Posts: 11,658
A 128 link chain will work.
__________________
2024 Linhai 300 ATV 4x4
2023 Lifan Lycan 250 Chopper
2023 Venom Evader
2022 Lifan KPX250
2020 Kawasaki Vulcan S (Sold)
2004 Honda ST 1300
2016 Black Hawk 250 (sold)
Keihin PE30 carb,125 main,38 slow.Pod filter,ported & decked head 10:1 CR,Direct Ignition Coil,15/40Sprockets,NGK DPR8EIX-9,De-Cat,Dual Oil Cooler,Digital Cluster
2016 Cazador180 XL
2014 Coolster150
JerryHawk250.com
My YouTube Channel


 
Reply With Quote
Old Today, 10:41 AM   #3
Bill Hilly   Bill Hilly is online now
 
Join Date: Feb 2021
Posts: 989
In my opinion , a 40/17 is not going to be a very good combination for you , nor for most people. I know you changed rear tire, and it reduced your gearing a little, but a 42-43/17 is really about as high as you should go. Some people that use the 40/17 have bikes like the TBR7, which has a smaller rear wheel, but on a Hawk, with an internally stock motor, and a hefty rider, living in a hilly part of the country, it's just going to make it hard to take off, and especially hard to take off from an upward slope. I think it would be harder on the bike than the few extra rpm that you want to reduce. I see post on the Facebook groups were people are recommending " crazy" combinations like 34/17. Jerry ran sprockets that ,if I remember right were 40/17, and was one of the few that was able to benefit from them, but he had a hotter motor, is under 200lbs, and lives in Louisiana.


 
Reply With Quote
Old Today, 11:02 AM   #4
ProDigit   ProDigit is online now
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 255
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Hilly View Post
In my opinion , a 40/17 is not going to be a very good combination for you , nor for most people. I know you changed rear tire, and it reduced your gearing a little, but a 42-43/17 is really about as high as you should go. Some people that use the 40/17 have bikes like the TBR7, which has a smaller rear wheel, but on a Hawk, with an internally stock motor, and a hefty rider, living in a hilly part of the country, it's just going to make it hard to take off, and especially hard to take off from an upward slope. I think it would be harder on the bike than the few extra rpm that you want to reduce. I see post on the Facebook groups were people are recommending " crazy" combinations like 34/17. Jerry ran sprockets that ,if I remember right were 40/17, and was one of the few that was able to benefit from them, but he had a hotter motor, is under 200lbs, and lives in Louisiana.
What rpm range you're getting at what speed?
You should be aiming towards 1k rpm every 10 mph, or 5k rpm at 50mph.
On my Xpect I run a 17/36t as ideal lowest gear. Been asking if the hawk has the same gear ratio as the Xpect, or not, and if it does, you should go with a 36-38t rather than a 40+t.
__________________



 
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.