![]() |
#16 | |
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Volcano, Ca
Posts: 7,112
|
Quote:
The reason CB's have been successful to this point is because they're cheap...and sell them to cheap ba$tards like us who can turn a wrench. The guy with the thicker wallet, who takes every rig to the shop, may have trouble opening it for a CB when a Big 4 bike is only 800+/- more, not counting luggage and farkles. Just my thoughts on this. Nothing more...........
__________________
"Light a fire for a man, and you heat him for a day. Light a man on fire, and you heat him for the rest of his life." 2007 Suzuki DRZ400S (SM convert) 2009 Q Link XP 200 1967 BSA B25 250cc Starfire 2022 Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 2023 Royal Enfield Scram 411 1948 Royal Enfield Model G 350 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Portsmouth, Virginia, USA
Posts: 632
|
I'll add to 2LZ's comments (I agree 100%). The 450cc thumper is a logical step up, recognizing that many riders in the US are convinced that a 250cc bike is too small for our highways. They reject the idea of riding 70 mph @ 7-8K rpm. If Zongshen can offer 35-40hp in a package about the size of the RX3 they suddenly have the small displacement ADV bike that nobody else offers. Everything else in that displacement range is either a street bike or serious dirt bike. Yes, the 450 might steal some RX3 sales. OTOH, the 450cc ADV market is untapped. We will have at least another year to watch this develop.
Peter Y. |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Redmond, WA.
Posts: 534
|
New pictures from Zong on the RX4
Zong has posted about a reveal and this is what they posted. New new photos and angles of the RX4. Interesting but I'm actually more interested in the RX3s with the parallel twin 390 but that's another year further out than the RX4 according to some material I read.
https://www.facebook.com/ZongshenMot...94276534056409
__________________
2017 BMW F800GS Adventure |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 24
|
I am also more interested in the proposed RX3S. I think that would be an ideal size lightweight adventure bike with enough power for longer, faster highway trips when needed.
It will have to be priced attractively however, the Versys seems to be selling well and has great reviews. I think RX3S will have to cost less and come with more standard features to remain competetive. |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 382
|
Anything lighter than the RX3 with Tourfellas becomes a kite when a speeding semi passes. Happened to me on my RX3. Adventure bikes catch a lot of wind with windshield, hand guards, double front fenders raised rear fender rumpflyer styling, and luggage. I'm not sure the RX3 modded with more speed would be safe when the luggage was empty. Loaded, no problem. 2 up, no problem.
As for the mechanical excellence of the RX3, I must have a lemon. Both brakes warped rotors, rear pads cracked linings, coolant and oil leaks, parts falling off, hardware falling out, etc. Reminds me of Japanese bikes of the early '60s. Then, way too much time for simple maintenance like an oil change with so many filters/screens/plugs, way to much time to get to the valves for adjustment, then reassemble the bike, etc. I can do a complete service on one my TW200s in about the same time it takes to adjust the valves on the RX3. Working on the road days at a time I resent the hours of riding lost to maintenance and repairs on the RX3. The RX3 is a wonderful bike, rides and handles well (19-inch front a big improvement on the street), stops well (with upgraded brakes), good lighting (especially with 35watt HID headlight), comfy with accessory seat, etc. The RX3 is pretty good at lots of things, but excellent at not much. Typical bike with widely ranging capabilities, dirt trails to highways and everything in between. It is a great performing package at a very good price, but mine has been a maintenance nightmare compared to my significantly modded TW200 adventure version with practically identical capabilities, other than the TW will walk away from the RX3 in soft terrain because it has so much more traction. For those who don't know, the TW's front tire is bigger than the RX3's rear tire, and the TW's rear tire is bigger than the tires on some cars, and that kind of traction requires a significantly different riding style some people can never adapt to to function well, so if you're one of those, the RX3 is a much better choice. Don't forget the modded RX3 costs about half the modded TW200, weeks less labor and minds less knowledge, and gives up only the extreme traction which some people actually find threatening. |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 547
|
Seriousyl, why are people still using photobucket?!??
I really, really would like to see the pictures, but:
|
![]() |
![]() |
#22 | |
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 382
|
Quote:
![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Monroe,NC
Posts: 131
|
I found a video posted on YouTube a couple days ago titled "New Zongshen RX3s and RX4 ride and review...Southern China Nov. 2017 (sorry, I can't get the link to work) that listed prices for each. They will also be available without the Tourfella luggage. Prices for the RX3s are between 4080-4992 USD AND 4535-5295 for the RX4. Sadly the video is not good quality as the volume gets cut out in several places so you can't hear what the reviewer is saying.
Also, those prices probably don't take into consideration the cost of EPA certification in the USA. |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 382
|
Actually, the RX3 price is more than it costs to get the bike on sale, shipped, to the continental U. S. of A. Therefore, I expect those prices are sufficient to cover certification.
I bought a RX3 from the original shipment. Quality has been disappointing, but it is Chinese. CSC has pushed through a number of improvements that apparently have rectified a number of the quality issues, and dealing with the Chinese, that isn't easy, so CSC deserves credit. On the other hand, other than the brakes and maintenance, performance has been excellent on the back roads, paved and dirt, of western Kentucky and northwest Tennessee. It is the perfect bike for touring off the main highways. It is quite spunky until the brakes decided to act up. I've been thinking of buying another RX3 with all the improvements to reduce maintenance time, but I already have 1 and would like a bit more spunk on interstates and a wider powerband, which I expect the 450 will provide since it apparently has a lower power/displacement ratio. I expect the 450 will easily handle the RX3s too tall final drive. I expect the RX4's brakes will be mounted to an appropriately machined surface. I've not seen any evidence of CSC allowing the same fraud twice. EDIT: I'll not waste the excellent RX3 engine of the original bike. I have a hook on a TW200 with a blown crank and holed case that could make good use of a RX3 engine. Still cheaper than building a TW up to RX3 capabilities. |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Monroe,NC
Posts: 131
|
Thanks Juanro.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Yuma, Arizona
Posts: 9,054
|
Found another thread on Mychinamoto that might be of interest...
http://www.mychinamoto.com/forums/sh...-rx4-test-ride
__________________
"They say that life's a carousel, spinning fast you got to ride it well..." TGB Delivery Scooter 150 TMEC 200 Enduro--carcass is sadly rotting in the backyard |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: Weed, California.
Posts: 271
|
This is a very old thread BUT I'm wondering if you guys ever did get a RX4
.... I did and love it the only real big complaint I can't fix is the enormous weight ! all the rest of my complaints I've finally managed to fix.... the seat height was a big one for me but I got it to 30" or less compressed. the ride was very harsh.... it's better now with a 500;b spring and a new lowering link I made but it could be softer... ( but I dare not go any softer as the tire will scrape on the rear fender well... so it is what it is now.) ... My biggest complaint is the Weight to me it weighs as much as my 1100cc Honda Shadow I had years ago.....it's so heavy it's extremely cumbersome ! the wide back tire has a tendancy to throw off your balance at the worst of times hit a little rock when coming to a stop with the side of the tire and the whole heavy bike all of a sudden leans to the side....... I think the answer to that problem is lower tire pressure but I am already at MIN on the dash readout but I think I will lower the air pressure anyway ! .... I've had no problems with the bike as far as crusing goes 70mph is easy for it. faster than that is slow on the uptake....I've done 80mph with it. and it had alot more to go. the ABS brakes took alot of getting used to.... they scared the heck out of me at first ! but if you burry them in an emergency stop, they will stop you very fast ! .... as far as logging road worthy I would say that is about as far on the dirt as I would want to go with that heavy beast , simply because of the weight. .... Bob.........
__________________
It's too late when you've gone too far ! |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|