Go Back   ChinaRiders Forums > Technical/Performance > Dual Sport/Enduro
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 05-09-2024, 08:50 PM   #1
ProDigit   ProDigit is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 83
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zapkin View Post
I can't help but think that if you consider how much work is actually done for the amount of fuel consumed, they are all incredibly inefficient. Is that a fair statement?
Not sure to what you'd compare it to.
If you compare it to a roketa mc 05 127, or a Grom, both getting well over 100mpg, any bike will look poor in comparison. The first bike being geared very aggressively for higher mpg/lower rpm per mph.

The Vader 150 is quite poor in it's gas mileage. Granted, I ride it at 6k rpm most of the time, and get a solid 60mpg out of it, while it gets closer to 80mpg when keeping it between 3 and 5k rpm.
This engine should be able to do 100mpg easily at 40-45mph (doing ~ 4k rpm.
A lot of the China bikes have lower performance when they're:
a- Air cooled, and,
b- not fuel injected.

Mainly because they'll run a pretty low compression ratio.
If there was only an easy way to increase compression ratio on pushrod engines... Especially people in colder regions will benefit from this (higher gas mileage, same or better performance).
__________________


 
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.