ChinaRiders Forums - View Single Post

**cheesy** · 10-17-2015, 08:54 PM

It was all subjective from butt feel and the fact I was riding the NC in a residential area. Spec-wise, they are near identical. HP is equivalent; 50 for CX, 51 for the NC. 1/4 mile times are almost equal as are 0-100mph times. The CX is no slouch, but the NC outshines the CX on the low end, nearly one second faster at 0-60. The newer technology is what makes it shine on the low end and gas mileage. The NC has a similar range with a 1.2 gallon smaller tank.

10-17-2015, 08:54 PM	#8
cheesy Moderator Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: Elburn, IL Posts: 5,814	It was all subjective from butt feel and the fact I was riding the NC in a residential area. Spec-wise, they are near identical. HP is equivalent; 50 for CX, 51 for the NC. 1/4 mile times are almost equal as are 0-100mph times. The CX is no slouch, but the NC outshines the CX on the low end, nearly one second faster at 0-60. The newer technology is what makes it shine on the low end and gas mileage. The NC has a similar range with a 1.2 gallon smaller tank. __________________ Cheesy ______________________________________ 07 Hi Bird Enduro-Flown the Coop 07 Ural Gear Up 79 Honda CX500 77 VeloSolex 4600 V3 73 VeloSolex 3800 I'm making this up as I go.-Indiana Jones Telling me something 'is for my own good', is a fast way to a fat lip.-Me I don't even care about my own problems, why should I care about yours?-Quote on one of my favorite t-shirts
	0